Skip to main content

not so bookish

stupidly, i didnt record the conversation with yvonne, the librarian at Teesside University, where HI is acredited. I had no idea that these people were so knowledgable, but that comes to show just how little time ive spent in a library in my adult life. I sent her a first draft of my literature review, but her straightforward response was that I kind of need to let the reader know wat im talking about, before i dive into a bunch of research culled from academic articles.

so like my coach, she has told me to work on my introduction which explains my aims and objectives, which tells what i am trying to do and why. Following would be my literature review of failure, which should look only at failure as it relates to learning or organizations, nothing else. Methodology needs to state what type of research techniques im using and why. Good question! We will rely on qualitative methods as I am seeking opinion rather than statistics. Once i have completed my interviews or questionaires, then i will need to sythesize the data collected to uncover insights, using the design thinking methods/double diamond model. Analyses of the datsa needs to link back to the literature, pointing out where its consistent or whre it contradicts the theory.

Needless to say, i lost much of her helpful feedback, it was fairly clear when she shared her feedback, but a couple of days later, and the scribbles i made are woefully insufficient. note to self: transcribe EVERYTHING

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

on constipation

probably too gross a topic to entertain on a blog, let alone include in a thesis, but this observation came to me today while on the crapper. I keep hoping the writing will soon becme more natural, and simply floooooooooooow. I picture the day where i look out the window and unbeknownst to me it has gone dark. Ive barely noticed the time pass as ive written 10 solid pages. Its not been like tht yet, but rather, like trying despreately to shit out a tiny peanut.

running a startup

brian sent me a text mesage saying i could interview him on his way to work. in a nour. sure, right, whatever. the only guy i know that runs a startup, this was pretty exciting. oh shit, no questions written, so i put some down quicjk so i wouldnt be fumbling when we spoke. good thing, his walk to work is just 15 min, and while he let me go over by around 8 min, by the end, i could tell he was in the office and had to attend to far more important stuff. so this is what i got. this is his first vc backed startup, the business he grew and sold in austin was bootstrapped. hes doing a kind of bio engineering biz to grow meat from cells. theyre on the 3rd round of funding, and i think i recall that it was some millions of dollars. so thats pre-seed and seed and then whatever comes after. they have just moved from dontown SF to berlkley, as they needed a bigger space. the team has grown to 16, and hes very confident speaking about all the stages of development like hes a pro. i just kind of ...

star struck

after several weeks wait, i got to speak to ashley good, the reason why i pursued this toic for my thesis. i had seen a ted talk on failure, where the NGO she had worked at decided to do the unheard of and publish their record of failures. instead of an annual report, their failure report pointed out all their failures, and this then launched her career as a consultant. based in vancouver, she runs fail forward which helps companies see the value of learning from mistakes. during the conversation, i lost my train of thought, like completely, and also could not think of some pretty basic words, like i had to ask her "whats that called when you act without a script" improvisation? she quickly replied. i conceeded that i might be a bit star struck, talking with the person who made this concept seem tangiable. yes, ther was Savoia (Author of the right it) before her, who turned me on to failosophy, and naturally theres Sitkin who wrote the paper that everytone sites back in 92,...