Skip to main content

not so bookish

stupidly, i didnt record the conversation with yvonne, the librarian at Teesside University, where HI is acredited. I had no idea that these people were so knowledgable, but that comes to show just how little time ive spent in a library in my adult life. I sent her a first draft of my literature review, but her straightforward response was that I kind of need to let the reader know wat im talking about, before i dive into a bunch of research culled from academic articles.

so like my coach, she has told me to work on my introduction which explains my aims and objectives, which tells what i am trying to do and why. Following would be my literature review of failure, which should look only at failure as it relates to learning or organizations, nothing else. Methodology needs to state what type of research techniques im using and why. Good question! We will rely on qualitative methods as I am seeking opinion rather than statistics. Once i have completed my interviews or questionaires, then i will need to sythesize the data collected to uncover insights, using the design thinking methods/double diamond model. Analyses of the datsa needs to link back to the literature, pointing out where its consistent or whre it contradicts the theory.

Needless to say, i lost much of her helpful feedback, it was fairly clear when she shared her feedback, but a couple of days later, and the scribbles i made are woefully insufficient. note to self: transcribe EVERYTHING

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

on constipation

probably too gross a topic to entertain on a blog, let alone include in a thesis, but this observation came to me today while on the crapper. I keep hoping the writing will soon becme more natural, and simply floooooooooooow. I picture the day where i look out the window and unbeknownst to me it has gone dark. Ive barely noticed the time pass as ive written 10 solid pages. Its not been like tht yet, but rather, like trying despreately to shit out a tiny peanut.

my story needed a bit more drama

There is no doubt that failure adds drama and as such, creates value. Just how often do chase films resort to the the old cliche of the driver choosing the wrong road, failing to acknowledge the sign reading "DANGER, works in progress", and ultimately flying off the side of a cliff. Just imagine how lifeless that scene would be if the road had just lead to a perfectly usable road. BORING! Of course the Hollywood version, airborn vehicles land on their feet and carry on, leaving those in pursuit scratching their heads, but in reality, I can imagine a far less opportune ending. So whereas the Feedback Toolkit I was gunning for might be extremely useful for a wide range of companies, I picked the wrong company, like choosing the wrong fork at an intersection. For the purposes of this study, it set off a panic because I was not so certain that I could land my a new concept in the small window allotted. Admitedly, thats my fault for not approaching my case study until the end of ...
oy, it just occured to me that my solution might not match my paper.is feedback a solution for learning from errors? did i mean communication, or reflection, that might be closer to what i was going for. oops. a bunch of interviews talked about peoples unwillingness to share about failure, but now im thinking that i picked the wrong solution. if the definition of feedback is to help someone improve, then thats not the solutuon for people sharing problems. oy, i guess it was psychological safety after all, and no, i never got around to researching that. honestly, i could probsbly knock that out in a couple of days. but this is soooo late in the game to be , wait, these two dont meet up